Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized clinical trial study

single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized clinical trial study

background: surgical technique using small-diameter  instruments and single-incision laparoscopy are two new options for less invasive laparoscopic cholecystectomy (lc). in this study, we have compared mini-lc (mlc) with single-incision lc (silc). materials and methods: this study is a randomized clinical trial conducted on the patients diagnosed with  symptomatic cholelithiasis who underwent l...

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized clinical trial study.

BACKGROUND Surgical technique using small-diameter instruments and single-incision laparoscopy are two new options for less invasive laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). In this study, we have compared mini-LC (MLC) with single-incision LC (SILC). MATERIALS AND METHODS This study is a randomized clinical trial conducted on the patients diagnosed with symptomatic cholelithiasis who underwent LC....

Mini-Incision Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus traditional four-port cholecystectomy.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has traditionally been performed using multiple small sites. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery has emerged as an alternative technique to improve cosmesis and minimize complications associated with multiple incisions. A retrospective study was performed of all patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy by a single surgeon (DTA) from April 2008 to August ...

Outcome of Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC) versus conventional four port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Cholelithiasis - A Randomized control trial

Aim: To compare the outcome of SIL (single incision laparoscopic) cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: Two hundred patients are included in this study fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria and arerandomly divided into two equal groups (100 in each). Results: Both the Groups were comparable and there is statistically significant differenc...